Re: [PATCH v4 09/14] irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu: add support for System Error Interrupts (SEI)

From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Haim Boot <hayim@marvell.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Hanna Hawa <hannah@marvell.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/14] irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu: add support for System Error Interrupts (SEI)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 17:41:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821174151.7fc7314b@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c3168e2-3653-5359-7ddb-9e6ac1b47bb8@arm.com>

Hi Marc,

Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 11:37:47
+0100:

> On 21/08/18 11:28, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
> > 
> > Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:19:04
> > +0100:
> >   
> >> On 21/08/18 10:08, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >>> Hi Marc,
> >>>
> >>> I'm fine with the rest of the comments, please find just one last
> >>> question below.
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>     
> >>>>> @@ -133,12 +164,36 @@ mvebu_icu_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d, struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
> >>>>>  		return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>  	}
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> -	/* Mask the type to prevent wrong DT configuration */
> >>>>> -	*type = fwspec->param[2] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> >>>>> +	/*
> >>>>> +	 * The ICU receives level-interrupts. MSI SEI are
> >>>>> +	 * edge-interrupts while MSI NSR are level-interrupts. Update the type
> >>>>> +	 * accordingly for the parent irqchip.
> >>>>> +	 */
> >>>>> +	if (msi_data->subset_data->icu_group == ICU_GRP_SEI)
> >>>>> +		*type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;      
> >>>>
> >>>> That's interesting. How is the resampling done here?    
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure to understand the question. What does 'resampling' means
> >>> in such context? MSI SEIs are of type "edge" and use the traditional
> >>> MSI signalling infrastructure. I'm asking to be sure not to ignore
> >>> something wrong in my code.    
> >>
> >> You seems to be turning a level interrupt into an edge.  
> > 
> > If is an SEI interrupt, it cannot be a level interrupt and the type
> > will be IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING.
> >   
> >> You can do that,
> >> but only if you resample the level on EOI (and regenerate the
> >> corresponding edge if the level is still high).  
> > 
> > What is before is a '& IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK' operation. In theory,
> > *type could be anything of IRQ_TYPE_{EDGE,LEVEL}_* at this moment. But,
> > as stated above, it cannot be anything else than IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING.
> > I thought more clear to enforce it but if this unclear and useless,
> > let's drop it?  
> 
> I think overriding the trigger that way is very confusing. Either it
> comes from DT, or it comes from the MSI framwork. In both cases, it has
> to be correct, and overriding it is just papering over other bugs.
> 
> I'd rather you put a WARN_ON if you encounter an illegal interrupt trigger.

Fine by me.

Thanks for all the guidance, I'll send a new iteration ASAP (with the
bindings updated).

Thanks,
Miquèl

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel