From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] ata: ahci_platform: support allwinner R40 AHCI Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:40:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20180831074024.w7yicj5y4imy57e2@flea> References: <20180830190120.722-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <8fa866c5-6800-505f-53bc-5c1b27582ca6@kernel.dk> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iiupw3y5uuqzr6al" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8fa866c5-6800-505f-53bc-5c1b27582ca6-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Jens Axboe Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , LABBE Corentin , Hans de Goede , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-ide-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel , linux-sunxi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --iiupw3y5uuqzr6al Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Hi Jens, On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 08:52:52PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 8/30/18 8:32 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:31 AM Jens Axboe wrote: > >> > >> On 8/30/18 1:01 PM, Corentin Labbe wrote: > >>> Hello > >>> > >>> This patchset add support for allwinner R40 AHCI controller. > >>> > >>> The whole patchset is tested on sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra and > >>> on sun7i-a20-cubieboard2 which doesnt have any of the ressources added > >>> by this serie, so no regression should come with it. > >>> > >>> The last patch(ata: ahci_sunxi: remove PHY code) should not be merged, > >>> but will be resent for inclustion when all patchs will have hit linus > >>> tree. > >> > >> Applied 1-12 with Hans's blessing, thanks Corentin. > > > > Please don't merge device tree ("dts") patches, i.e. patches 9-12. We will > > merge them through the sunxi / armsoc tree. Having them in separate trees > > introduces conflicts when we have other stuff going through our tree. > > OK, fair enough, I can drop those. And the DT bits actually have some issues that would need to change the code significantly. Can you drop all of them please? Thanks! Maxmie -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --iiupw3y5uuqzr6al--