From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: cpsw: Document cpsw-phy-sel usage but prefer phandle Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 13:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20180902.135243.1983575431820096428.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180829150024.43210-1-tony@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180829150024.43210-1-tony@atomide.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: tony@atomide.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, m-karicheri2@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Tony Lindgren Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:00:23 -0700 > The current cpsw usage for cpsw-phy-sel is undocumented but is used for > all the boards using cpsw. And cpsw-phy-sel is not really a child of > the cpsw device, it lives in the system control module instead. > > Let's document the existing usage, and improve it a bit where we prefer > to use a phandle instead of a child device for it. That way we can > properly describe the hardware in dts files for things like genpd. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren Applied.