From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing configuration Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:45:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20180903134522.GC13888@piout.net> References: <20180903093308.24366-1-quentin.schulz@bootlin.com> <20180903133415.GF4445@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180903133415.GF4445@lunn.ch> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Quentin Schulz , ralf@linux-mips.org, paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net, kishon@ti.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, allan.nielsen@microchip.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/09/2018 15:34:15+0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > I suggest patches 1 and 8 go through MIPS tree, 2 to 5 and 11 go through > > net while the others (6, 7, 9 and 10) go through the generic PHY subsystem. > > Hi Quentin > > Are you expecting merge conflicts? If not, it might be simpler to gets > ACKs from each maintainer, and then merge it though one tree. > There are some other DT changes for this cycle so those should probably go through MIPS. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com