From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing configuration Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 10:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20180904.101729.1821343612467900393.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20180903134522.GC13888@piout.net> <20180903.220910.899357653888940454.davem@davemloft.net> <20180904151653.GI13888@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180904151653.GI13888@piout.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, quentin.schulz@bootlin.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, kishon@ti.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, allan.nielsen@microchip.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Alexandre Belloni Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:16:53 +0200 > What I meant was that 1/11 and 8/11 should go through MIPS because of > the potential conflicts. The other patches can go through net-next as > that will make more sense. Maybe Quentin can split the series in two, > one for MIPS and one for net if that makes it easier for you to apply. It would make things easier for me.