From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/sun4i: Enable DE2 Mixer for SUN8I and SUN50I Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 16:48:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20180905144852.db2galdquxx22kjh@flea> References: <20180904163609.10171-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20180904163609.10171-3-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20180905070748.g43lfdqdhmoci6pk@flea> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="en7fpj6tbqjjbcyr" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Jagan Teki Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Icenowy Zheng , Jernej Skrabec , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , David Airlie , dri-devel , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk , Michael Trimarchi , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree , linux-kernel , linux-sunxi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --en7fpj6tbqjjbcyr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:51:25PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:06:08PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> Allwinner SoC like SUN8I and SUN50I are now using DE2 Mixer > >> so enable them as default. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki > >> --- > >> Changes for v4, v3: > >> - none > >> Changes for v2: > >> - Enable for SUN8I > >> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig > >> index c2c042287c19..cfa8b96273fb 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig > >> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ config DRM_SUN8I_DW_HDMI > >> > >> config DRM_SUN8I_MIXER > >> tristate "Support for Allwinner Display Engine 2.0 Mixer" > >> - default MACH_SUN8I > >> + default MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) > > > > I'm not really sure we should put it as a default. We should just > > enable it in the defconfig. > > What would be the difference in both cases it would be build as module > since DRM_SUN4I=m for ARM64 We wouldn't force it down the throat to every user by default, even though they have no interest in that driver being compiled into their kernel. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --en7fpj6tbqjjbcyr--