From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH 04/21] ARM: topology: remove unneeded check for /cpus node Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:37:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20180905193738.19325-5-robh@kernel.org> References: <20180905193738.19325-1-robh@kernel.org> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180905193738.19325-1-robh@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Checking for "/cpus" node is not necessary as of_get_cpu_node() will fail later on anyways. The call to of_find_node_by_path() also leaks a reference. So just remove the check. Cc: Russell King Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- Please ack and I will take via the DT tree. This is dependent on the first 2 patches. arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c index 24ac3cab411d..60e375ce1ab2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c @@ -94,12 +94,6 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void) __cpu_capacity = kcalloc(nr_cpu_ids, sizeof(*__cpu_capacity), GFP_NOWAIT); - cn = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"); - if (!cn) { - pr_err("No CPU information found in DT\n"); - return; - } - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { const u32 *rate; int len; -- 2.17.1