Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add binding for Rock960 board

[Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>]

Hi Heiko,

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 07:22:26PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Montag, 10. September 2018, 17:13:54 CEST schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> > Add devicetree binding for Rock960 board from Vamrs Limited.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
> > index acfd3c773dd0..aaad9e2ff9a3 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
> > @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Rockchip platforms device tree bindings
> >      Required root node properties:
> >        - compatible = "vamrs,ficus", "rockchip,rk3399";
> >  
> > +- 96boards RK3399 Rock960 (ROCK960 Consumer Edition)
> > +    Required root node properties:
> > +      - compatible = "vamrs,rk3399-rock960", "rockchip,rk3399";
> 
> hmm, are there more boards labeled rock960 from Vamrs?
> Because I'm trying to determine what makes "vamrs,rock960" unsuitable.
> 

Not that I'm aware of but the intention was to follow other RK3399 based
boards. Anyhow, I have no issues with "vamrs,rock960" if you prefer it!

Thanks,
Mani

> 
> Heiko
> 
>