From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] edac: synopsys: Add macro defines for ZynqMP DDRC Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:41:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20180924104152.GD20187@zn.tnic> References: <1537194305-9243-1-git-send-email-manish.narani@xilinx.com> <1537194305-9243-5-git-send-email-manish.narani@xilinx.com> <20180924092226.GA20187@zn.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Manish Narani Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , Michal Simek , "leoyang.li@nxp.com" , "sudeep.holla@arm.com" , "amit.kucheria@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:29:44AM +0000, Manish Narani wrote: > > Is there some significance here or can they all be vertically aligned? > Should I increase the alignment of the existing macros in the 'code > formatting' patches? New macros will need an increased indentation. If there is no significance to that different alignment, you probably should so that it is all on one column. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.