From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 26/34] dt-bindings: add broadcom (formerly plx technology) vendor prefix Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:24:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20180925182459.GA21710@bogus> References: <20180831163817.23970-1-marcel@ziswiler.com> <20180831163817.23970-27-marcel@ziswiler.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Cc: Marcel Ziswiler , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcel Ziswiler , Thierry Reding , David Lechner , Johan Hovold , Alexandre Belloni , Mark Rutland List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.08.2018 um 18:38 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler: > > From: Marcel Ziswiler > > > > PLX Technology meanwhile got bought by Broadcom Corporation but the > > vendor prefix plx is still used in 8 current device trees. This silences > > the following checkpatch.pl warning: > > > > WARNING: DT compatible string vendor "plx" appears un-documented > > -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler > > Sounds sensible, > > Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber > > You may want to tweak the subject though, it is slightly confusing as > Broadcom already has a vendor prefix. Yes, please. With that, Acked-by: Rob Herring