From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] regulator/mfd: Support ROHM BD71847 power management IC Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:30:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20180928133046.GL20825@sirena.org.uk> References: <3996792a07fea45d94d4d712ed05527199cc4ac0.1536912922.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> <20180921172959.GG20825@sirena.org.uk> <20180921180241.GA4358@dell> <20180921181217.GI20825@sirena.org.uk> <20180921185258.GC4358@dell> <20180928071437.GB9389@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FC52J0nKTzya17Ed" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180928071437.GB9389@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matti Vaittinen Cc: Lee Jones , robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, sboyd@kernel.org, mazziesaccount@gmail.com, heikki.haikola@fi.rohmeurope.com, mikko.mutanen@fi.rohmeurope.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --FC52J0nKTzya17Ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:14:37AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > I was just wondering if I could do something to help get this patch > series applied? Mark, have you had the time to take a look on pickable > ranges addition yet? Should I do some rebasing/resending? Are you giving > me a nudge if I can do something? Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings just adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) and if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway so resending with any comments addressed is generally a=20 much better approach. --FC52J0nKTzya17Ed Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAluuLQUACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BtGQf/QFUaMLrG9eT2Ec/ViAZkRB7MpdFWjEgtcj/nvmgxzouVP0X+qku8pJOQ F9TjXDjwV2mDxHRHOHfZoCNfSnm4XVOy+j8y/AnKVmXcuAwM1QFz1D7UVPO1Pon4 IpJOE5XVcgPCiiFbFFGcHuN55yeL0q2AddfKoAZueYWzB0Cv86DUJR5EMexbAlrw w6Oxl+Fz+bFfJ36sMV5a/CeNt/uCPUbnd8blBTSp5vlRbyxbSIpDa9GTDBarqGcC 3rYdKsE1Czhlt/aPV41BDnN3mQbHD364auuWu4OTIcwTLAV6PRnm9wLCGyIbifpA VWohT1mGMMtpTrdQVwjykIXPxgkG+A== =AKQG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FC52J0nKTzya17Ed--