devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Maciej Purski <m.purski@samsung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 11/11] regulator: core: Properly handle case where supply is the couple
Date: Fri,  5 Oct 2018 18:36:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005153638.1886-12-digetx@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005153638.1886-1-digetx@gmail.com>

Check whether supply regulator is the couple to avoid infinite recursion
during of locking.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index a3448636f334..46e816cb80b5 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -233,6 +233,21 @@ static void regulator_unlock(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	mutex_unlock(&regulator_nesting_mutex);
 }
 
+static bool regulator_supply_is_couple(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+	struct regulator_dev *c_rdev;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 1; i < rdev->coupling_desc.n_coupled; i++) {
+		c_rdev = rdev->coupling_desc.coupled_rdevs[i];
+
+		if (rdev->supply->rdev == c_rdev)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static void regulator_unlock_recursive(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 				       unsigned int n_coupled)
 {
@@ -245,7 +260,7 @@ static void regulator_unlock_recursive(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 		if (!c_rdev)
 			continue;
 
-		if (c_rdev->supply)
+		if (c_rdev->supply && !regulator_supply_is_couple(c_rdev))
 			regulator_unlock_recursive(
 					c_rdev->supply->rdev,
 					c_rdev->coupling_desc.n_coupled);
@@ -283,7 +298,7 @@ static int regulator_lock_recursive(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			*old_contended_rdev = NULL;
 		}
 
-		if (c_rdev->supply) {
+		if (c_rdev->supply && !regulator_supply_is_couple(c_rdev)) {
 			err = regulator_lock_recursive(c_rdev->supply->rdev,
 						       new_contended_rdev,
 						       old_contended_rdev,
-- 
2.19.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-05 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-05 15:36 [PATCH v1 00/11] Continuing the work on coupled regulators Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] regulator: core: Add voltage balancing mechanism Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] regulator: core: Change voltage setting path Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] regulator: core: Mutually resolve regulators coupling Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] regulator: core: Don't allow to get regulator until all couples resolved Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] dt-bindings: regulator: Change regulator-coupled-max-spread property Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-17 13:25   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-17 13:32     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-17 13:33       ` Rob Herring
2018-10-17 13:36         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-17 13:27   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-17 13:31     ` Rob Herring
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] regulator: core: Limit regulators coupling to a single couple Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] dt-bindings: regulator: Document new regulator-max-step-microvolt property Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-17 13:33   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] regulator: core: Add new max_uV_step constraint Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] regulator: core: Decouple regulators on regulator_unregister() Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking Dmitry Osipenko
2018-11-08 13:07   ` Mark Brown
2018-11-08 16:53     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-10-05 15:36 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2018-10-08 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] Continuing the work on coupled regulators Tony Lindgren
2018-10-09  8:52   ` Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181005153638.1886-12-digetx@gmail.com \
    --to=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.purski@samsung.com \
    --cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).