From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 2/5] net: Introduce a new MII time stamping interface.
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 12:15:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181007191551.gy4l4g6qdgz6ztez@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181007182751.GC22794@lunn.ch>
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:27:51PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> The mii_timestamper is generic, in the same why hwmon is generic. It
> does not matter where the time stamper is. So i'm wondering if we
> should remove the special case for a PHY timestamper, remove all the
> phylib support, etc.
This implementation is (to the best of my understanding) what you were
asking for in your review of v1:
> So i really think you need to cleanly integrate into phylib and
> phylink.
> Use a phandle, and have
> of_mdiobus_register_phy() follow the phandle to get the device.
> To keep lifecycle issues simple, i would also keep it in phydev, not
> netdev.
This present series is a reasonable, incremental improvement to the
existing PHY time stamping support. It will handle any use case that
I can think of, and I would like to avoid over-engineering this.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-07 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-07 17:38 [PATCH V2 net-next 2/5] net: Introduce a new MII time stamping interface Richard Cochran
2018-10-07 18:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-10-07 19:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-10-07 19:15 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2018-10-07 19:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-10-07 20:59 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-07 21:07 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-07 21:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-10-07 21:14 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-10-07 21:20 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-08 4:39 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-08 2:04 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-08 15:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-10-08 15:28 ` Richard Cochran
2018-10-08 15:36 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181007191551.gy4l4g6qdgz6ztez@localhost \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).