From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aleksandr Aleksandrov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: new board - Emlid Neutis N5 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:35:23 +0300 Message-ID: <20181012093523.GA29014@imagebutcher> References: <1538745949-13188-2-git-send-email-aleksandr.aleksandrov@emlid.com> <1539012044-29998-1-git-send-email-aleksandr.aleksandrov@emlid.com> <1539012044-29998-2-git-send-email-aleksandr.aleksandrov@emlid.com> <20181010144957.exrlupoph7ovsmdw@flea> <9398571539259289@myt4-929fb874f3f2.qloud-c.yandex.net> <2d09d6c0-0404-589d-2c34-da846cff4fb8@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2d09d6c0-0404-589d-2c34-da846cff4fb8@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Cc: Maxime Ripard , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Chen-Yu Tsai , David Lechner , Thierry Reding , Noralf =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tr=F8nnes?= , Johan Hovold , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, > >>  +/ { > >>  + model = "Emlid Neutis N5 Developer board"; > >>  + compatible = "emlid,emlid-neutis-n5-devboard", > >>  + "emlid,emlid-neutis-n5", > >> > >> Do you need the two emlid there? What comes before the comma is the > >> vendor, while what is after is the model. > >   > > I think emlid-neutis-n5 module could be useful in the future, no need > > this now. > > You misunderstand: The point would be to use, e.g., "emlid,neutis-n5" > instead of "emlid,emlid-neutis-n5" with duplicate "emlid,emlid-". It is > orthogonal to having multiple compatible strings. Oh, I agree. No need to duplicate "emlid". Thank you! > >>  +&uart1 { > >>  + pinctrl-names = "default"; > >>  + pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins>, <&uart1_rts_cts_pins>; > >>  + status = "okay"; > >>  +}; > >> > >> I guess this is for bluetooth? Have you tested serdev drivers? > >> > > Yes, bluetooth is connected over uart1. > > You mean if I have tested bluetooth stack via serial device? > > Not quite, we're missing a child node within uart1 for a serdev driver. > Is there no such driver yet for your Bluetooth chipset, or did you not > yet check? Got it. I haven't checked a serdev driver. Maxim, the SoM can't be run without a motherboard. According to your last message I don't change dts files, right? Aleksandr