From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add entries for passing load values Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:55:16 -0500 Message-ID: <20181012145516.GA10205@bogus> References: <1539004739-32060-1-git-send-email-vbadigan@codeaurora.org> <1539004739-32060-3-git-send-email-vbadigan@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1539004739-32060-3-git-send-email-vbadigan@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, evgreen@chromium.org, dianders@google.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org, riteshh@codeaurora.org, stummala@codeaurora.org, sayalil@codeaurora.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Vijay Viswanath , Mark Rutland , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , open list List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:48:58PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti wrote: > From: Vijay Viswanath > > The load a particular sdhc controller should request from a regulator > is device specific and hence each device should individually vote for > the required load. > > Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath > Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt > index 502b3b8..cb22178 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt > @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ Required properties: > "xo" - TCXO clock (optional) > "cal" - reference clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) > "sleep" - sleep clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional) > +- qcom,-current-level-microamp - specifies load levels for supply during BUS_ON and > + BUS_OFF states in power irq. Should be specified in > + pairs (lpm, hpm), for BUS_OFF and BUS_ON respectively. > + Units uA. Seems like something that should be common?