From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guo Ren Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 08/21] csky: Process management and Signal Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 10:37:15 +0800 Message-ID: <20181018023713.GC12027@guoren-Inspiron-7460> References: <9ae1d1609a49d976ae7659157507018b0c846423.1539655732.git.ren_guo@c-sky.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Andrew Morton , Daniel Lezcano , David Miller , gregkh , Christoph Hellwig , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch , DTML , Rob Herring , c-sky_gcc_upstream@c-sky.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:01 AM Guo Ren wrote: > > > > This patch adds files related to task_switch, sigcontext, signal, > > fpu context switch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > > --- > > Changelog: > > - abiv2/fpu.c: Userspace should never be sent NSIGXXX as a si_code. > > Use FPE_FLTUNK instead. > > - abiv2/fpu.c: Use force_sig_fault instead. > > I'm hesitant to provide a Reviewed-by: tag for this one, as I don't > understand the signal handling enough myself, and it's something > that should be reviewed properly because of the ABI implications. > > Maybe someone else can have a closer look at this? NSIGXXX and force_sig_fault modification is from Eric W. Biederman in PATCH V6 and I forget add: Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Best Regards Guo Ren