devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: ti-lmu: Remove LM3697
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 00:10:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018221048.GA6364@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa401333-9650-c925-2085-6e6d17b576bd@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2001 bytes --]

Hi!

> >>>> Given this one seems to have not really been finished, it's probably
> >>>> okay to make changes in this case. Still, it would be good to see
> >>>> patches structured so that it's obvious we're breaking things. But how
> >>>> the patches are structured doesn't matter until there's some agreement
> >>>> on the end result.
> >>>
> >>> OK, so if I'm getting it right, the correct patch structure in this case
> >>> means that changes removing bindings from MFD and moving them along
> >>> with the modifications to the LED subsystem should be placed in a single
> >>> patch.
> >>>
> >>> Dan, could you please arrange the next patch set version accordingly?
> >>
> >> Yes I can squash the DT bindings patches and call it a "move and modify"
> > 
> > You can do move without problems. But if you plan to modify them,
> > please try to change as little as possible, make it separate patch and
> > explain why new version is better than old one.
> > 
> 
> I have been thinking of how to do this.  Since the 2 devices are part of the current
> binding there really is not a way to move them.  Since there are still MFD capable
> devices available.
> 
> I would still need to remove the current active binding and create a new binding in the LED
> bindings directory.
> 
> I would have to remove and create in the same patch.

Yeah, and this all is a sign that you should just keep the current
binding, and make your code use it, see?

You are free to use Sebastian's updated binding. It has "suggested by:
Rob" or something like that on it, so it should be fine.

You can add note to bindings/leds pointing to mfd binding.

Now... this is what I've suggested before. If you don't agree, you may
want to contact Tony Lindgren, IIRC he works for TI, too, and might be
willing to help.

Thank you,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-18 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-11 16:51 [PATCH v3 0/9] TI LMU common Framework Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] leds: add TI LMU backlight driver Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: ti-lmu: Remove LM3697 Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 18:27   ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-11 18:34     ` Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 19:38       ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-10-12 16:26         ` Rob Herring
2018-10-12 18:03           ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-13 18:45             ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-10-15  0:56               ` Rob Herring
2018-10-15 19:13                 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-10-15 19:14                   ` Dan Murphy
2018-10-15 21:45                     ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-16 13:25                       ` Dan Murphy
2018-10-18 22:10                         ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2018-10-19 11:42                           ` Dan Murphy
2018-10-19 14:58                             ` Tony Lindgren
2018-10-24  8:55                               ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-12  9:07   ` Lee Jones
2018-10-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove support for LM3697 Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for lm3697 driver Dan Murphy
2018-10-12 16:27   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-19 11:47     ` Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] leds: lm3697: Introduce the " Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] dt-bindings: ti-lmu: Remove LM3633 Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove support for LM3633 Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] dt-bindings: leds: Add support for the LM3633 Dan Murphy
2018-10-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] leds: lm3633: Introduce the lm3633 driver Dan Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181018221048.GA6364@amd \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
    --cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).