From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] OLPC 1.75 Keyboard/Touchpad fixes Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 11:01:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20181030100139.GB21529@amd> References: <20181010142504.233467-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> <20181015195612.GB29649@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lubomir Rintel Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Stephen Boyd , James Cameron , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > > This makes keyboard/touchpad work on a DT MMP2 platform. > > >=20 > > > I believe that it would be a good idea if this, once reviewed, went > > > in > > > via the input tree. The DT and CLK parts got reviews/acks. > > >=20 > > > Changes from v1: > > > - Basically none, just re-send, including Ack and Review tags in > > > patches > > > that received them. Plus an extra Cc. > > > I'd be very thankful for reviews. > >=20 > > Ok, I believe I have OLPC 1.75, and it is actually a nice > > machine. Can I get recent kernel working there in useful fashion? (Is > > there docs somewhere)? >=20 > A lovely machine indeed. I've written this now: >=20 > https://github.com/hackerspace/olpc-xo175-linux/wiki/How-to-run-an-up-to-= date-Linux-on-a-XO-1.75 >=20 > I didn't test it yet -- will do when I get home in the evening. But > chances are it's good enough and I guess you'd be able to get it > working even if I messed up some details. Ok, let me check. I went to this branch: commit f99b274084d320814f4b035a7e3455af424229ea Author: Lubomir Rintel Date: Sun Aug 5 23:11:27 2018 +0200 First comment: the zImage size adjusting hack should really be somewhere in tools/ and preferably in python. This is way beyond reasonable use of shell. > Please let me know if it works for you -- I'm having trouble getting > reviews/acks/tested-bys for the XO-1.75 patch sets [1] and will be > super thankful if I get some feedback from you. >=20 > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/bundle/lkundrak/OLPC%20XO%201.75/ You want to just continue without them :-). As long as you don't change the core code, you should be ok. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlvYLAIACgkQMOfwapXb+vIJdwCfbPsc+dDKc8pF4G+DixcMANs4 IhkAn05f8C5B7DFCPkU2Xhc4eAp1Jr9/ =I0OY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k--