From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] of: Add cpu node iterator for_each_of_cpu_node() Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:12:02 -0500 Message-ID: <20181101151201.GJ5994@gate.crashing.org> References: <20180905193738.19325-1-robh@kernel.org> <20180905193738.19325-2-robh@kernel.org> <874ld3jz6v.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <871s87jz3g.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <87tvl1dq7q.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tvl1dq7q.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Frank Rowand , Tyrel Datwyler List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 09:52:57PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Rob Herring writes: > > Yes, I was aware at least older powerpc DTs don't use 'cpu' for node names. > > Actually newer ones too, see below :) Good, because that is required by the Open Firmware standard (the PowerPC binding, to be exact): http://www.openbios.org/data/docs/ppc-2_1.ps (see 5.1.4, "name"). Segher