From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] Add the I3C subsystem Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 19:10:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20181111191017.7b2efdf1@bbrezillon> References: <20181026144333.12276-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> <20181111173932.GA12254@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181111173932.GA12254@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Przemyslaw Sroka , Arkadiusz Golec , Alan Douglas , Bartosz Folta , Damian Kos , Alicja Jurasik-Urbaniak , Cyprian Wronka , Suresh Punnoose , Rafal Ciepiela , Thomas Petazzoni , Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala devi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 09:39:32 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 04:43:24PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > I think we've reached a point where we can eventually consider the I3C > > framework for inclusion in 4.20 (5.0?). A few more issues were reported > > on v9 and fixed in v10. I can't guarantee that the implementation is > > free of bugs but I still think it's worth merging it in v4.20: it's a > > new subsystem, so we don't risk regressions, and the only way we can > > detect other issues is by having other people experiment with this > > implementation. > > > > The only remaining concern raised by Arnd is the fact that both hosts > > and slaves share the same bus type and are differentiated thanks to > > their device_type, which IMHO is fine since this is what other > > subsystems do (plus I don't see other solutions to have both I3C > > devices and I3C buses represented under /sys/bus/i3c/). > > Yeah, it's not the nicest, but it will work, we did it also for USB and > greybus and it solves the issue. > > This all looks good to me, so I've queued it up. Let's see if > linux-next has any problems with it. I recently asked Stephen to add the linux-i3c tree to linux-next, so I'm expecting conflicts :-/. Sorry, I didn't know you were planning to take these patches through your tree. BTW, I also fixed a couple of things when rebasing on top of 4.20-rc1: - KernelVersion in the sysfs ABI doc has been updated to 5.0 - Fixed i3c_master_getmxds_locked() (bug reported/fixed by Colin here https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1799850.html) - Removed a blank line at the end of master-driver-api.rst For the record, the i3c/next branch pulled by Stephen is available here [1]. > Thanks for sticking with it, nice work! Thanks for reviewing it! Greg, Stephen, let me know if you want me to reset i3c/next to v4.20-rc1 to avoid conflicts in linux-next. Regards, Boris [1]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/i3c/linux.git/log/?h=i3c/next