From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: sunxi: Add A10 CSI driver Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:46:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20181113154647.06900549@windsurf> References: <9a9616d2-a189-bd0e-e2e6-f84bdcb1dfd1@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Hans Verkuil , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Maxime Ripard , Hans Verkuil , Sakari Ailus , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Laurent Pinchart , linux-media , Andrzej Hajda , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-kernel , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:13:09 -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Actually, LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 has GPL-2.0-or-later > > as a valid license: > > > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > > > Personally I very much prefer GPL-2.0-or-later since I think it is > > much clearer. > > I saw feedback from Greg to use the SPDX style from > Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. > > Please check: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/10/232 According to https://spdx.org/licenses/, i.e the reference SPDX site, GPL-2.0-or-later is the right thing to use, and GPL-2.0+ is "deprecated". But apparently Greg's feedback is "let's not used the SDPX style, as we don't want to change this all over". Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com