From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] at24: remove
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 17:03:29 +0100
Message-ID: <20181118170329.788778a8@bbrezillon>
References: <20181113140133.17385-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181113140133.17385-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>, Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.orglin
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:01:08 +0100
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:

> As far as merging of this series goes: I'd like to avoid dragging it over
> four releases. The series is logically split into five groups:
> 
> patches 1-2: nvmem and mtd changes
> patches 3-9: davinci arch-specific changes
> patches 10-13: networking changes
> patches 14-24: davinci specific again
> patch 25: final at24 change
> 
> With that I believe we can do the following: Greg KH could pick up the
> first two patches into his char-misc tree.

The char-misc tree? Why not the MTD or NVMEM tree?

> Sekhar would take the second
> group and the third would go through the networking tree since the first
> three sets are not linked in any way. This would be merged for 4.21. Then
> for the next release Sekhar would pick up 14-24, provide an immutable
> branch for me and I'd merge the final patch for at24 and send it upstream
> through Wolfram's i2c tree (maybe we could even delay the i2c PR in the
> merge window to avoid the immutable branch altogether).