From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] device property: Introduce fwnode_get_name() Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:56:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20181126125656.GF10650@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20181126114752.69597-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <20181126114752.69597-2-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181126114752.69597-2-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Heikki Krogerus Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mika Westerberg , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:47:50PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > This helper returns the name of the node. The name is > primarily expected to be returned from a new fwnode > operation meant for this purpose, but when no name is > returned, the helper will also attempt to read a device > property "name". > +int fwnode_get_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, char *buf, size_t len) > +{ > + const char *name; > + int ret; > + > + if (!fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode, get_name, buf, len)) > + return 0; > + > + ret = fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode, property_read_string_array, > + "name", &name, 1); > + if (!ret) > + snprintf(buf, len, "%s", name); What are we going to do in case snprintf has found no room for entire string? > + > + return ret; > +} -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko