From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@oss-tech.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
"moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@l>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v1 3/4] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code.
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:12:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203171223.GD17883@e107155-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181203165833.GA27796@arm.com>
(Fixed Juri Lelli's email)
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:58:34PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:28:19PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> > a common place instead of duplicate code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 22 ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 303 +-------------------------------------
> > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 294 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Whilst I'm happy seeing this code moved out, I'd like to have an entry in
> MAINTAINERS so that somebody can review changes from the arm64 side without
> having to poll a load of different lists. I assume patches would still go
> via Rafael and Greg, but if we could have Sudeep added as Reviewer for this
> file, then I'd really appreciate it.
>
Thanks Will for pointing this. I agree with you and like to be added as
reviewer for this.
Since arch_topology.c was mostly added for ARM/ARM64 and by Juri Lelli
(who is no longer with ARM) and I did review the initial version, I would
like to assume maintenance for this file if both Juri and Greg are OK
with it so that I can keep an eye on this as we expect more changes to
this both for ARM and RISC-V. I am fine if anyone who has contributed
more to this file wants to maintain.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 23:28 [RFT PATCH v1 0/4] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2018-11-29 23:28 ` [RFT PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation: DT: arm: add support for sockets defining package boundaries Atish Patra
2018-12-03 16:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-12-12 2:18 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-29 23:28 ` [RFT PATCH v1 2/4] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding Atish Patra
2018-12-03 16:55 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-12-03 17:23 ` Atish Patra
2018-12-03 17:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-12-03 17:40 ` Atish Patra
2018-12-12 2:21 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-12 2:31 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-12 18:23 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-29 23:28 ` [RFT PATCH v1 3/4] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code Atish Patra
2018-12-03 16:58 ` Will Deacon
2018-12-03 17:12 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2018-12-04 9:50 ` Juri Lelli
2018-12-03 17:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-12-03 17:31 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-29 23:28 ` [RFT PATCH v1 4/4] RISC-V: Parse cpu topology during boot Atish Patra
2018-12-03 16:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-12-05 17:53 ` [RFT PATCH v1 0/4] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V Jeffrey Hugo
2018-12-11 0:26 ` Atish Patra
2018-12-07 13:45 ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-12-07 15:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-12-11 0:11 ` Atish Patra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181203171223.GD17883@e107155-lin \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitriy@oss-tech.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@l \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).