From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:21:40 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] dt-bindings: sc16is7xx: Add alternative clock-frequence property Message-ID: <20181207142140.GJ10650@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20181205141133.9305-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20181207134844.GH10650@smile.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181207134844.GH10650@smile.fi.intel.com> To: Vladimir Zapolskiy Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Georgii Staroselskii , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 03:48:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 10:18:26AM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > > On 12/05/2018 04:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > For the platforms which have no clock provider for the sc16is7xx type of UART, > > > introduce an alternative clock-frequency property which would be used instead. > > > > the subject has a typo in 'clock-frequence', then can you please tell me more, > > how is it possible that an SC16IS7xx IC has no clock provider connected to it? > > I better ask Grigorii about this, since I have no hardware at my possession. My apologizes, I meant Georgii! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko