From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] spi: add support for octal mode Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:50:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20181210095042.354d422f@bbrezillon> References: <1543826226-30898-1-git-send-email-yogeshnarayan.gaur@nxp.com> <20181203101937.7b01a0ad@bbrezillon> <214dadd9-859c-ca88-1aff-1c83fcfa3c0b@ti.com> <20181205134618.56223758@bbrezillon> <20181206074554.0ec0aecb@bbrezillon> <20181206202956.GG3084@sirena.org.uk> <20181210092208.0971c3be@bbrezillon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur Cc: Mark Brown , Vignesh R , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "marek.vasut@gmail.com" , "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "robh@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" , "frieder.schrempf@exceet.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:39:20 +0000 Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote: > Hi Boris, > > Sorry for confusion. > > My intention was just to point to the correct patch number only. Earlier you have asked Mark to pick the patch [1] but that patch number was not correct. Look at the context in [1] (we have good reasons to reply inline instead of top-posting). I asked Mark to pick "spi: nxp-fspi: add octal mode flag bit for octal support", not the m25p80 changes. I was wrong though, as the patch I pointed to depends on your nxp-fspi patchset which as not been merged yet. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/5/758