From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds: lp5024: Add the LP5024/18 RGB LED driver Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:35:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20181230173505.GA19593@amd> References: <20181219201047.GA23448@amd> <54f28115-0a7d-8e9c-3bec-6e91fb3981ec@gmail.com> <71d3ac12-5beb-0a26-71e1-5eae798e7b9f@gmail.com> <2bca210b-76ad-d5a9-906c-4151695050c3@gmail.com> <45ce01f0-af6e-1cc6-5126-fb557c7d2a82@ti.com> <20181229190726.GA29851@amd> <4b5a89ed-0c0b-3103-ca57-a0f97aa5ace9@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4b5a89ed-0c0b-3103-ca57-a0f97aa5ace9@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jacek Anaszewski Cc: Dan Murphy , robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun 2018-12-30 18:09:35, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 12/29/18 8:07 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >Hi! > > > >>>>With the "color" sysfs file it will make more sense to allow for user > >>>>defined color palettes. > >>>> > >>> > >>>I think defining these values in the device tree or acpi severely limi= ts the devices > >>>capabilities. Especially in development phases. If the knobs were ex= posed then the user space > >>>can create new experiences. The color definition should be an absolut= e color defined in the dt and > >>>either the framework or user space needs to mix these appropriately. = IMO user space should set the policy > >>>of the user experience and the dt/acpi needs to set the capabilities. > >>> > >>>I do like Pavels idea on defining the more standard binding pattern to= "group" leds into a single group. > >>> > >>>Maybe the framework could take these groups and combine/group them int= o a single node with the groups colors. > >> > >>There is still HSV approach [0] in store. One problem with proposed > >>implementation is fixed algorithm of RGB <-> HSV color space conversion. > >>Maybe allowing for some board specific adjustments in DT would add > >>more flexibility. > >> > >>[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/31/255 > > > >Yes we could do HSV. Problem is that that we do not really have RGB > >available. We do have integers for red, green and blue, but they do > >not correspond to RGB colorspace. >=20 > OK, so conversion from HSV to RGB would only increase the aberration. > So, let's stick to RGB - we've got to have some stable ground and this > is something that the hardware at least pretends to be compliant >with. I'm not saying that we should stick to RGB. I'm just saying that problem is complex. And no, hardware does not even pretend to be compliant with RGB color model ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RGB_color_model ). In particular, in RGB there is non-linear brightness curve. > Our problem is how to set the color atomically. With HSV approach we > were to obviate the problem by mapping brightness file to the "V" > component of that color space, and write all H,S and V values to the > hardware only on write to brightness file. I'm not sure how realistic the "atomic color" problem is. Computers are way faster than human vision. I believe problem to start with is the "white" problem. Setting R=3DG=3DB=3D255 will _not_ result in anything close to white light on hardware I have. Anyway, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlwpAckACgkQMOfwapXb+vIhpQCfS83ci9L7MbTalisB+P5Ztdw0 YXkAn1KqE3+dR8IkohS02o+hspyKEbXg =XO1Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--