From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: Consistent capitalization of "device tree"?
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 20:24:58 +0100
Message-ID: <20190107192458.GG933@amd>
References: <20190107183711.GA5671@amd>
 <91bc4723-8e3a-4ed6-5104-36a614d6a6d2@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7lMq7vMTJT4tNk0a"
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <91bc4723-8e3a-4ed6-5104-36a614d6a6d2@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org


--7lMq7vMTJT4tNk0a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon 2019-01-07 11:06:27, Frank Rowand wrote:
>=20
> + Frank
>=20
> On 1/7/19 10:37 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Is it "Device Tree" or "device tree"?
> >    =20
> >  pavel@duo:/data/l/k/Documentation$ grep -r "Device Tree"  | wc -l
> >  235
> >  pavel@duo:/data/l/k/Documentation$ grep -r "device tree"  | wc -l
> >  595
> >    =20
> > I guess it would be nice to make it consistent. I guess "device tree"
> > is preffered?
> >=20
> > Should we do something like this?
> > 								Pavel
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> >    =20
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt b/Documentation=
/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt
> > index 725fb8d..cc5f507 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt
> > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ companion document to Documentation/devicetree/dynamic-=
resolution-notes.txt[1]
> >  How overlays work
> >  -----------------
> > =20
> > -A Device Tree's overlay purpose is to modify the kernel's live tree, a=
nd
> > +A device tree's overlay purpose is to modify the kernel's live tree, a=
nd
> >  have the modification affecting the state of the kernel in a way that
> >  is reflecting the changes.
> >  Since the kernel mainly deals with devices, any new device node that r=
esult
> >=20
>=20
> Not a strong opinion, but I would prefer a third option of devicetree.  T=
hat
> makes it much easier to search for.

That one is much less popular at the moment -- according to my
searches... so it would be a bigger change.

(Which I'll gladly support if I won't have to do the work... as long
as it is consistent. But I believe that "device tree" is most common
here, makes sense, and is easiest change, so...)

								Pavel

--=20
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--7lMq7vMTJT4tNk0a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlwzp4oACgkQMOfwapXb+vLEswCbBdm8IyiDQtOuQQ0KTBtyw36x
Rn8AoJx0B+t/4p+SF3GVwBh1YyRYJHsX
=V5r1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7lMq7vMTJT4tNk0a--