From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 09:01:19 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: Fix graph_port warning Message-ID: <20190109170119.GR5544@atomide.com> References: <20190107160512.9480-1-tony@atomide.com> <20190107183419.GG5544@atomide.com> <46dce758-2339-c4ef-891b-5cf4522fb7df@ti.com> <20190108155606.GM5544@atomide.com> <4F877B6F-2AED-4891-9676-5AB69B01C1AD@goldelico.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F877B6F-2AED-4891-9676-5AB69B01C1AD@goldelico.com> To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" Cc: Tomi Valkeinen , Rob Herring , linux-omap , =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Cousson , devicetree List-ID: * H. Nikolaus Schaller [190109 16:47]: > Ho Tony, Tomi, > > > Am 08.01.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Tony Lindgren : > > > > * Tomi Valkeinen [190108 07:57]: > >> On 07/01/19 21:34, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > >> > >>>>> If there's only one port, then it is redundant and you should drop reg > >>>>> instead. > >>> > >>> If I remember correctly it was required by older omapdrm code (which > >>> did scan for a reg property) but that may have changed. Therefore I've > >>> added Tomi to this discussion. > >> > >> I don't think so. The code looks for 'reg', but if it's not there, then > >> it's considered 0. > > > > FYI, the binding doc for the graph bindings is at > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt if there is > > any questions on how things should work. > > I interpret it that "port@number" is only needed if there are > multiple ports and there should not be any "@" or "reg" for the > single port case. Although it seems not to be explicitly > forbidden. > > The &dss port doesn't have it either. > > So let's remove the reg = <0>; > > It also seems that > > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > > is not required in this case and can also be removed. > > I've tested and it works with v5.0-rc1. > > There is an edited patch [1] but IMHO you as the original > author should post it. Looks good to me. But since you already modified it, all you need to do is add your Signed-off-by after mine and mail it out :) That is if you want to keep me as the original author I guess for the description. Otherwise we have to go through one more round of emails where I post it you ack it and so on as I can't test it. Regards, Tony > [1]: http://git.goldelico.com/?p=letux-kernel.git;a=commit;h=e46369390f62ce7176e91dfa443185e4b097ef4b