From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DT for NanoPi M4 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:12:58 -0600 Message-ID: <20190116211258.GA29888@bogus> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+glpar-linux-rockchip=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Robin Murphy Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:05:31 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > There are a number of subtle differences between the nanopi4 variants, > and where they disagree, the common DTSI currently follows the details > of NanoPi M4. In order to improve matters even more, let's add a > separate DTS for the M4 to which we can start splitting things out > appropriately. The third variant, NanoPi NEO4, is a lot closer to the M4 > than either is to the larger T4, so arguably could get away with just > sharing the M4 DT for now (plus I have neither of the smaller boards to > actually test with). > > CC: Rob Herring > CC: Mark Rutland > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy > --- > > v2: Fix the copy-paste binding thinko > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 ++++-- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 + > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-nanopi-m4.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-nanopi-m4.dts > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring