* [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] regulator: bd718x7 use chip specific and generic data structs
@ 2019-01-25 11:02 Matti Vaittinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Matti Vaittinen @ 2019-01-25 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mazziesaccount, matti.vaittinen
Cc: heikki.haikola, mikko.mutanen, lee.jones, robh+dt, mark.rutland,
broonie, gregkh, rafael, mturquette, sboyd, linus.walleij,
bgolaszewski, sre, lgirdwood, a.zummo, alexandre.belloni, wim,
linux, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-clk, linux-gpio, linux-pm,
linux-rtc, linux-watchdog
Header rohm-bd718x7.h was split to generic and component specific
parts. This changed the struct bd718x7. Adapt the regulator driver to
these changes.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c
index ccea133778c8..9109920b4a06 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c
@@ -1018,11 +1018,11 @@ static int bd718xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct bd718xx *mfd;
struct regulator_config config = { 0 };
struct bd718xx_pmic_inits pmic_regulators[] = {
- [BD718XX_TYPE_BD71837] = {
+ [ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71837] = {
.r_datas = bd71837_regulators,
.r_amount = ARRAY_SIZE(bd71837_regulators),
},
- [BD718XX_TYPE_BD71847] = {
+ [ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71847] = {
.r_datas = bd71847_regulators,
.r_amount = ARRAY_SIZE(bd71847_regulators),
},
@@ -1037,15 +1037,15 @@ static int bd718xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
}
- if (mfd->chip_type >= BD718XX_TYPE_AMOUNT ||
- !pmic_regulators[mfd->chip_type].r_datas) {
+ if (mfd->chip.chip_type >= ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_AMOUNT ||
+ !pmic_regulators[mfd->chip.chip_type].r_datas) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported chip type\n");
err = -EINVAL;
goto err;
}
/* Register LOCK release */
- err = regmap_update_bits(mfd->regmap, BD718XX_REG_REGLOCK,
+ err = regmap_update_bits(mfd->chip.regmap, BD718XX_REG_REGLOCK,
(REGLOCK_PWRSEQ | REGLOCK_VREG), 0);
if (err) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to unlock PMIC (%d)\n", err);
@@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ static int bd718xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* for all reset types because OTP loading at READY will clear SEL
* bit allowing HW defaults for power rails to be used
*/
- err = regmap_update_bits(mfd->regmap, BD718XX_REG_TRANS_COND1,
+ err = regmap_update_bits(mfd->chip.regmap, BD718XX_REG_TRANS_COND1,
BD718XX_ON_REQ_POWEROFF_MASK |
BD718XX_SWRESET_POWEROFF_MASK |
BD718XX_WDOG_POWEROFF_MASK |
@@ -1078,17 +1078,17 @@ static int bd718xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Changed all resets from SVNS to READY\n");
}
- for (i = 0; i < pmic_regulators[mfd->chip_type].r_amount; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < pmic_regulators[mfd->chip.chip_type].r_amount; i++) {
const struct regulator_desc *desc;
struct regulator_dev *rdev;
const struct bd718xx_regulator_data *r;
- r = &pmic_regulators[mfd->chip_type].r_datas[i];
+ r = &pmic_regulators[mfd->chip.chip_type].r_datas[i];
desc = &r->desc;
config.dev = pdev->dev.parent;
- config.regmap = mfd->regmap;
+ config.regmap = mfd->chip.regmap;
rdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, desc, &config);
if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static int bd718xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* can now switch the control from PMIC state machine to the
* register interface
*/
- err = regmap_update_bits(mfd->regmap, r->init.reg,
+ err = regmap_update_bits(mfd->chip.regmap, r->init.reg,
r->init.mask, r->init.val);
if (err) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev,
@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ static int bd718xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
}
for (j = 0; j < r->additional_init_amnt; j++) {
- err = regmap_update_bits(mfd->regmap,
+ err = regmap_update_bits(mfd->chip.regmap,
r->additional_inits[j].reg,
r->additional_inits[j].mask,
r->additional_inits[j].val);
--
2.14.3
--
Matti Vaittinen
ROHM Semiconductors
~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then, he vanished ~~~
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-01-25 11:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-25 11:02 [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] regulator: bd718x7 use chip specific and generic data structs Matti Vaittinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).