From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heikki Krogerus Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/12] usb: roles: Find the usb role switch by also matching against the device node Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:35:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20190125123540.GA7262@kuha.fi.intel.com> References: <20181203034515.91412-1-chenyu56@huawei.com> <20181203034515.91412-8-chenyu56@huawei.com> <20181203122534.GD24338@kuha.fi.intel.com> <20190121135135.GA22960@kuha.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190121135135.GA22960@kuha.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chen Yu Cc: Andy Shevchenko , liuyu712@hisilicon.com, USB , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Suzhuangluan , Kongfei , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Hans de Goede , John Stultz List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:51:35PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 04:36:13PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote: > > Have the fwnode_get_name() patches been accepted? > > No, I didn't have a user for the function anymore: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/17/284 > > > And I will be grateful if you can tell me your plan about the > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/24/619 patches. > > The plan is to send a new version of them together with the > fwnode_get_name() patch. I can send them this week. I'm about to send the graph support for the device connection API, but just letting you know that I did not need the fwnode_get_name() in the end in that series unfortunately. Br, -- heikki