From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, sudeep.holla@arm.com, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, nm@ti.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mka@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 09:09:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190129090948.3yomjtpbdsar576w@queper01-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129051030.gu5nhr6vmcd35bzk@vireshk-i7>
Hi Viresh,
On Tuesday 29 Jan 2019 at 10:40:30 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > +int of_dev_pm_opp_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *KHz, int cpu)
>
> I would suggest to change the return type to unsigned long and return 0 for
> errors and positive values for mW.
Well, I can't really do that -- this must match the API of PM_EM:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.0-rc4/source/include/linux/energy_model.h#L62
I'll make sure to make that explicit in the commit message for v2.
>
> > +{
> > + unsigned long mV, Hz, MHz;
>
> MHz is used only once, I think you can get rid of it just open code the division
> by 1000000. Maybe remove Hz as well and directly use kHz.
I would expect/hope the compiler will optimize things like that for me
but yes, I can try to reduce a bit the temp variables if you prefer.
>
> > + struct device *cpu_dev;
> > + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > + u32 cap;
> > + u64 tmp;
>
> Name this mW with the above changes.
So that doesn't really work given what I mentioned above.
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> > + if (!cpu_dev)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + np = of_node_get(cpu_dev->of_node);
> > + if (!np)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "dynamic-power-coefficient", &cap);
> > + of_node_put(np);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + Hz = *KHz * 1000;
> > + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(cpu_dev, &Hz);
> > + if (IS_ERR(opp))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + mV = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(opp) / 1000;
> > + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
> > + if (!mV)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + MHz = Hz / 1000000;
> > + tmp = (u64)cap * mV * mV * MHz;
> > + do_div(tmp, 1000000000);
> > +
> > + *mW = (unsigned long)tmp;
> > + *KHz = Hz / 1000;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dev_pm_opp_get_cpu_power);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> > index 0a2a88e5a383..fedde14f5187 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> > @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, struct cpumask *cpuma
> > struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(struct device *dev);
> > struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_get_of_node(struct dev_pm_opp *opp);
> > int of_get_required_opp_performance_state(struct device_node *np, int index);
> > +int of_dev_pm_opp_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *KHz, int cpu);
> > #else
> > static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > @@ -364,6 +365,10 @@ static inline int of_get_required_opp_performance_state(struct device_node *np,
> > {
> > return -ENOTSUPP;
> > }
>
> Add a blank line here. We missed adding the same before
> of_get_required_opp_performance_state() earlier, maybe add the new routine
> before of_get_required_opp_performance_state() and add blank line before and
> after it :)
Sounds good !
>
> > +static inline int of_dev_pm_opp_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *KHz, int cpu)
> > +{
> > + return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > #endif
> >
> > #endif /* __LINUX_OPP_H__ */
> > --
> > 2.20.1
>
> --
> viresh
Thanks,
Quentin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-28 16:55 [PATCH 0/7] Register an Energy Model for Arm reference platforms Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 19:02 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29 9:03 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 17:52 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29 5:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29 9:09 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 19:36 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29 5:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29 9:15 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-30 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-30 9:12 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-30 10:20 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 5:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29 9:10 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpufreq: scpi: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 5:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: scmi: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: juno: Add cpu dynamic-power-coefficient information Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 15:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-01-30 10:23 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm: dts: vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: " Quentin Perret
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190129090948.3yomjtpbdsar576w@queper01-lin \
--to=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).