From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, sudeep.holla@arm.com, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, nm@ti.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:20:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190130102042.uwxpsep5vmeq4h62@queper01-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190130101715.nz2bpqnust7gv4at@vireshk-i7>
On Wednesday 30 Jan 2019 at 15:47:15 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 30-01-19, 09:12, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > What I had in mind is something as simple as:
> >
> > void of_dev_pm_opp_register_em(struct cpumask *cpus)
> > {
> > /* Bail out if an EM is there */
> > if (em_cpu_get(cpumask_first(cpus)))
> > return;
> >
> > /* Check prerequisites: dpc coeff in DT, ... */
> > ...
> >
> > em_register_perf_domain(...);
> > }
> >
> > IIUC, Matthias' point was that if the EM is already registered, there is
> > no good reason to call em_register_perf_domain() again. Now, that should
> > in fact be harmless because em_register_perf_domain() already does that
> > check. It's just cleaner and easier to understand from a conceptual
> > standpoint to not call that function several times for no reason I
> > assume.
>
> If there is no good reason to call em_register_perf_domain() several
> times, then the same applies to of_dev_pm_opp_register_em() as well,
> isn't it ?
Hrmpf, that is true ... :-)
> This is init code anyway isn't going to run a lot, so I wouldn't
> suggest adding any such (duplicate) checks in
> of_dev_pm_opp_register_em().
Fair enough, I'll post a v2 w/o the check and we'll see if others have
complaints.
Thanks,
Quentin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-30 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-28 16:55 [PATCH 0/7] Register an Energy Model for Arm reference platforms Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 19:02 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29 9:03 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 17:52 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29 5:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29 9:09 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 19:36 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29 5:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29 9:15 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-30 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-30 9:12 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-30 10:20 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2019-01-29 5:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29 9:10 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpufreq: scpi: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 5:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: scmi: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: juno: Add cpu dynamic-power-coefficient information Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 15:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-01-30 10:23 ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm: dts: vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: " Quentin Perret
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190130102042.uwxpsep5vmeq4h62@queper01-lin \
--to=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).