From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
To: Harald Geyer <harald@ccbib.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: teres-i: enable backlight
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 21:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190208201711.fqqvhqd7gbqnoefp@flea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208141629.14323-1-harald@ccbib.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2866 bytes --]
Hi Harald,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:16:29PM +0000, Harald Geyer wrote:
> Enable pwm and add a pretty standard backlight node.
>
> The regulator is always on, but we include it anyway, because it is
> required by the binding document.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harald Geyer <harald@ccbib.org>
> ---
> The backlight node got dropped from the initial submission of the
> teres-i DT, because PWM support wasn't available in time, and I
> kind of forgot to resubmit once PWM was in. Sorry about that.
>
> While testing this patch I noticed, that sometimes on boot the
> brightness is set to max_brightness instead of the default specified
> in DT. I couldn't reproduce it reliably, but it seems to be related
> to changing the pwm period. I guess the logic trying to detect
> the brightness set by the boot loader gets confused in some corner
> case if the pwm periods don't match. However unbinding and rebinding
> the device to the driver always made it go to the proper default
> brightness, so the problem is clearly not in the DT.
>
> If the theory above is true, then it implies that the version of
> u-boot running on my laptop doesn't completely overwrite all pwm
> parameters. As this might be specific to my installation, I didn't
> mention the issue in the commit message.
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Drop all the other stuff that got merged a year ago.
> * Rebased on current sunxi/for-next branch
> * Add power-supply property (just to conform to the binding)
> * Use slightly different brightness-levels
>
> Actually I tried omitting brightness-levels completely, as it is now
> optional. However automatic calculation gives unreasonable results
> (depending on the exact value of pwm period). A report has been sent
> to the author of the code.
>
>
> .../arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts
> index 7b7b14ba58e6..2a78932d5d3b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts
> @@ -21,6 +21,15 @@
> serial0 = &uart0;
> };
>
> + backlight: backlight {
> + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> + pwms = <&pwm 0 50000 0>;
> + power-supply = <®_dcdc1>;
> + brightness-levels = <0 5 10 15 20 30 40 55 70 85 100>;
The backlight perceived brightness should increase lineary with each
step, which means that if you have ten steps, each step should
increase the perceived brightness by 10%. The eye being what it is, a
exponential sequence is usually a much better approximation.
It looks good otherwise, thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-08 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 14:16 [PATCHv3] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: teres-i: enable backlight Harald Geyer
2019-02-08 20:17 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190208201711.fqqvhqd7gbqnoefp@flea \
--to=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=harald@ccbib.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).