From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Allwinner sunxi message box support Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 15:47:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20190301144703.kyqyajysfsdvg3td@flea> References: <20190301052947.32032-1-samuel@sholland.org> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ghobjd6npcdkzhom" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190301052947.32032-1-samuel-RkNLwX/CsU9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Samuel Holland Cc: Jassi Brar , Chen-Yu Tsai , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --ghobjd6npcdkzhom Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Hi On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:29:37PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote: > This series adds support for the "hardware message box" in sun8i, sun9i, > and sun50i SoCs, used for communication with the ARISC management > processor (the platform's equivalent of the ARM SCP). The end goal is to > use the arm_scpi driver as a client, communicating with firmware running > on the ARISC CPU, or to use the mailbox to forward NMIs that the > firmware picks up from R_INTC. > > Changes from v1: > - Marked message box clocks as critical instead of hacks in the driver > - 8 unidirectional channels instead of 4 bidirectional pairs > - Use per-SoC compatible strings and an A31 fallback compatible > - Dropped the mailbox framework patch > - Include DT patches for SoCs that document the message box > > Samuel Holland (10): > clk: sunxi-ng: sun8i: Mark the msgbox clock as critical > clk: sunxi-ng: sun9i: Mark the msgbox clock as critical > clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i: Mark the msgbox clock as critical > dt-bindings: mailbox: Add a sunxi message box binding > mailbox: sunxi-msgbox: Add a new mailbox driver > ARM: dts: sunxi: a80: Add msgbox node > ARM: dts: sunxi: a83t: Add msgbox node > ARM: dts: sunxi: h3/h5: Add msgbox node > arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add msgbox node > arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add msgbox node It looks good to me but a few things: - There's no reason to split the first three patches, so they should all be merged - You might consider using a YAML schemas for your DT bindings documentation. That will bring a more formal descriptiion and DT validation. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --ghobjd6npcdkzhom--