From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] of: fix kmemleak crash caused by imbalance in
 early memory reservation
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 18:12:48 -0800
Message-ID: <20190306021248.GA17298@roeck-us.net>
References: <3c886941-bf9d-f040-b568-ee7a8eba9a04@free.fr>
 <CGME20190123055509epcas3p18a6d66fa08412f2308cb2c1997328ea8@epcas3p1.samsung.com>
 <20190123055414.GA4747@rapoport-lnx>
 <78f4ea8a-996d-038e-9e33-5ff02fa2c43f@samsung.com>
 <20190123123143.GE4747@rapoport-lnx>
 <4b8f82c4-7f8f-b814-c1ec-9902e43963f6@free.fr>
 <617e0d57-342d-4162-bd21-ece18e481d87@free.fr>
 <CAL_JsqKbCg-rGmLoA3mPv54=LMuQBfevfzL8f2QPVyjN-sNk8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190213085028.6199594b@canb.auug.org.au>
 <CAL_JsqK-cC6oVZ9MkP+ExOGjCRhA0XxGSgqGKL3W9bFF3rKAgA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK-cC6oVZ9MkP+ExOGjCRhA0XxGSgqGKL3W9bFF3rKAgA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Prateek Patel <prpatel@nvidia.com>, DT <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:12:24PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:50 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:03:09 -0600 Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:47 AM Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 04/02/2019 15:37, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.15+
> > > > > Fixes: 3f0c820664483 ("drivers: of: add initialization code for dynamic reserved memory")
> > > > > Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > > > > Acked-by: Prateek Patel <prpatel@nvidia.com>
> > > > > Tested-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Resend with DT CCed to reach robh's patch queue
> > > > > I added CC: stable, Fixes, and Prateek's ack
> > > > > Trim recipients list to minimize inconvenience
> > > >
> > > > I'm confused over commit 3532b3b554a216f30edb841d29eef48521bdc592 in linux-next
> > > > "memblock: drop __memblock_alloc_base()"
> > > >
> > > > It's definitely going to conflict with the proposed patch
> > > > over drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> > > >
> > > > Rob, what's the next step then?
> > >
> > > Rebase it on top of what's in linux-next and apply it to the tree
> > > which has the above dependency. I'm guessing that is Andrew Morton's
> > > tree.
> >
> > Yeah, that is in Andrew's "post linux-next" patch series, so if you
> > rebase it on top of linux-next and then send it to Andrew with some
> > explanation.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Actually, if it is intended for the stable trees, then presumably it is
> > intended to go to Linus for the current release?  In which case, the
> > patch in Andrew's tree will have to be changed to cope after your patch
> > appears in Linus' tree (and therefore, linux-next).
> 
> At this point in the cycle, I wasn't planning to send this for 5.0.
> It's not fixing something introduced in 5.0 and it is a debug feature.
> 
Hi Rob,

this may be a debug feature, but we do test our kernels with it enabled,
and the problem does affect our 4.19 branch (chromeos-4.19). Are you
suggesting that we should backport the fix into our branch and not send
the backport to -stable ?

No problem, just trying to avoid wasting our time.

Thanks,
Guenter