From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] ata: ahci: Support per-port interrupts
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 08:58:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307085848.777e62ff@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd3e733d-110f-7fa0-a637-6d4bd4475142@redhat.com>
Hi Hans,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote on Wed, 6 Mar 2019 16:01:16
+0100:
> > /**
> > * ahci_platform_enable_clks - Enable platform clocks
> > * @hpriv: host private area to store config values
> > @@ -385,6 +394,7 @@ static int ahci_platform_get_regulator(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv, u32 port,
> > * or for non devicetree enabled platforms a single clock
> > * 4) resets, if flags has AHCI_PLATFORM_GET_RESETS (optional)
> > * 5) phys (optional)
> > + * 6) interrupt(s)
> > *
> > * RETURNS:
> > * The allocated ahci_host_priv on success, otherwise an ERR_PTR value
> > @@ -396,7 +406,7 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv;
> > struct clk *clk;
> > struct device_node *child;
> > - int i, enabled_ports = 0, rc = -ENOMEM, child_nodes;
> > + int i, enabled_ports = 0, rc = -ENOMEM, child_nodes, ctrl_irq;
> > u32 mask_port_map = 0;
> > > if (!devres_open_group(dev, NULL, GFP_KERNEL))
> > @@ -489,10 +499,30 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > goto err_out;
> > }
> > > + hpriv->irqs = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*hpriv->irqs) * hpriv->nports,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!hpriv->irqs) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ctrl_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (ctrl_irq < 0) {
> > + if (ctrl_irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> > + rc = ctrl_irq;
> > + goto err_out;
> > + }
> > + ctrl_irq = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ctrl_irq > 0)
> > + hpriv->irqs[0] = ctrl_irq;
> > +
> > if (child_nodes) {
> > for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
> > u32 port;
> > struct platform_device *port_dev __maybe_unused;
> > + int port_irq;
> > > if (!of_device_is_available(child))
> > continue;
> > @@ -521,6 +551,18 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > }
> > #endif
> > > + if (!ctrl_irq) {
> > + port_irq = of_irq_get(child, 0);
> > + if (!port_irq)
> > + port_irq = -EINVAL;
> > + if (port_irq < 0) {
> > + rc = port_irq;
> > + goto err_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + hpriv->irqs[port] = port_irq;
> > + }
> > +
> > rc = ahci_platform_get_phy(hpriv, port, dev, child);
> > if (rc)
> > goto err_out;
> > @@ -548,6 +590,18 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > if (rc == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > goto err_out;
> > }
> > +
> > + if (!ctrl_irq && !enabled_ports) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No IRQ defined\n");
> > + rc = -ENODEV;
> > + goto err_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (enabled_ports > 1) {
> > + hpriv->flags |= AHCI_HFLAG_MULTI_MSI;
> > + hpriv->get_irq_vector = ahci_get_per_port_irq_vector;
> > + }
> > +
>
> I believe that the "if (enabled_ports > 1)" here needs to be:
>
> if (!ctrl_irq && enabled_ports > 1) {
>
> Otherwise existing boards which use a single irq defined at the
> main of_node level for the device and have defined more then 1
> child-node in their DTB will now get AHCI_HFLAG_MULTI_MSI set,
> but they will only have hpriv->irqs[0] set to the ctrl_irq
> leading to returning of 0 as irq from ahci_get_per_port_irq_vector
> for the other ports, which is wrong.
>
> Otherwise this patch looks good to me, so with this fixed
> (assuming you agree) you may add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>
> to the next version of this patch.
You are completely right, this is a mistake, I will fix it in v3. I
will just wait for the review of the other ahci_mvebu patches.
Thanks,
Miquèl
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-07 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 10:21 [PATCH v2 00/10] Enable per-port SATA interrupts and drop an hack in the IRQ subsystem Miquel Raynal
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] ata: libahci: Ensure the host interrupt status bits are cleared Miquel Raynal
2019-03-07 16:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-07 17:19 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] ata: ahci: Support per-port interrupts Miquel Raynal
2019-03-06 15:01 ` Hans de Goede
2019-03-07 7:58 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] dt-bindings: ata: Update ahci bindings with possible " Miquel Raynal
2019-03-12 19:05 ` Rob Herring
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] ata: ahci: mvebu: Rename a platform data flag Miquel Raynal
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] ata: ahci: mvebu: Add a parameter to a platform data callback Miquel Raynal
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] dt-bindings: ata: Update ahci_mvebu bindings Miquel Raynal
2019-03-12 19:06 ` Rob Herring
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] ata: ahci: mvebu: Support A8k compatible Miquel Raynal
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] ata: ahci: mvebu: Add support for A8k legacy bindings Miquel Raynal
2019-03-07 16:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu: Remove the double SATA ports interrupt hack Miquel Raynal
2019-03-06 10:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64: dts: marvell: armada-cp110: Switch to per-port SATA interrupts Miquel Raynal
2019-03-06 10:30 ` Baruch Siach
2019-03-06 10:34 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190307085848.777e62ff@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).