From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] sunxi: Add DT representation for the MBUS controller Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:11:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20190408081126.t3blyvtcqslzvki2@flea> References: <5ca841d1.1c69fb81.f4702.b85d@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1758319257==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5ca841d1.1c69fb81.f4702.b85d@mx.google.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Arnd Bergmann , Robin Murphy , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Georgi Djakov , Paul Kocialkowski , Chen-Yu Tsai , Yong Deng , Frank Rowand , Dave Martin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --===============1758319257== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c76vyty33d6z4egg" Content-Disposition: inline --c76vyty33d6z4egg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 01:06:07AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:56:40AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We've had for quite some time to hack around in our drivers to take into > > account the fact that our DMA accesses are not done through the parent > > node, but through another bus with a different mapping than the CPU for the > > RAM (0 instead of 0x40000000 for most SoCs). > > > > After some discussion after the submission of a camera device suffering of > > the same hacks, I've decided to put together a serie that introduce a > > special interconnect name called "dma" that that allows to express the DMA > > relationship between a master and its bus, even if they are not direct > > parents in the DT. > > > > Let me know what you think, > > Maxime > > LGTM. > > How do you propose merging this? I can take 1-5, and 6 and 7 thru > arm-soc? You can merge 1-4, and I'll merge 5 through drm-misc and 6-7 through arm-soc Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --c76vyty33d6z4egg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXKsCLQAKCRDj7w1vZxhR xZKLAQCbmk2yvswmO0TPvIl1FazUwQaAxU0HI2xgbCi3thP+qAEAznWmHNrvUygL JgGoQT8Qqzr7ef+Iv5p73RhVRqufaQI= =iiRP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c76vyty33d6z4egg-- --===============1758319257== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVs --===============1758319257==--