From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Add new compatible for static replicator Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:25:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20190426142522.GA15387@bogus> References: <20190412102738.12679-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20190412102738.12679-2-leo.yan@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190412102738.12679-2-leo.yan@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mathieu Poirier , Suzuki K Poulose , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Leo Yan List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:27:35 +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > compatible string. > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > Dynamic replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator: > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring