From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH] of_net: add mtd-mac-address support to of_get_mac_address() Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:48:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20190430004845.GA29722@bogus> References: <1555445100-30936-1-git-send-email-ynezz@true.cz> <93770c6a-5f99-38f6-276b-316c00176cac@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93770c6a-5f99-38f6-276b-316c00176cac@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Frank Rowand Cc: Florian Fainelli , Petr =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0tetiar?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Mark Rutland , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , John Crispin , Felix Fietkau List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 08:01:56PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 4/16/19 5:29 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > > > On 16/04/2019 13:05, Petr Štetiar wrote: > >> From: John Crispin > >> > >> Many embedded devices have information such as MAC addresses stored > >> inside MTD devices. This patch allows us to add a property inside a node > >> describing a network interface. The new property points at a MTD > >> partition with an offset where the MAC address can be found. > >> > >> This patch has originated in OpenWrt some time ago, so in order to > >> consider usefulness of this patch, here are some real-world numbers > >> which hopefully speak for themselves: > >> > >>   * mtd-mac-address                used 497 times in 357 device tree files > >>   * mtd-mac-address-increment      used  74 times in  58 device tree files > >>   * mtd-mac-address-increment-byte used   1 time  in   1 device tree file > >> > >> Signed-off-by: John Crispin > >> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau > >> [cleanup of the patch for upstream submission] > >> Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar > >> --- > > > > [snip] > > > >> +static const void *of_get_mac_address_mtd(struct device_node *np) > >> +{ > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD > >> +    void *addr; > >> +    size_t retlen; > >> +    int size, ret; > >> +    u8 mac[ETH_ALEN]; > >> +    phandle phandle; > >> +    const char *part; > >> +    const __be32 *list; > >> +    struct mtd_info *mtd; > >> +    struct property *prop; > >> +    u32 mac_inc = 0; > >> +    u32 inc_idx = ETH_ALEN-1; > >> +    struct device_node *mtd_np = NULL; > > > > Reverse christmas tree would look a bit nicer here. > > Do we a variable declaration format preference for drivers/of/*? We'd better get one. It's all the rage. How about fallen Christmas tree: int a; bool fallen; char christmas_tree; int for_our; int dt; Rob