From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: raise GPU trip point temperature for speedy to 80 degC
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 14:47:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190515214759.GF40515@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=XgoG5hiT=vAhNtUF4iVj1-Lmj7S5tvk86ehxB1uUZyxw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:30:12AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 8:31 AM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > Raise the temperature of the GPU thermal trip point for speedy
> > to 80°C. This is the value used by the downstream Chrome OS 3.14
> > kernel, the 'official' kernel for speedy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts
> > index 2ac8748a3a0c..394a9648faee 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts
> > @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@
> > temperature = <70000>;
> > };
> >
> > +&gpu_alert0 {
> > + temperature = <80000>;
> > +};
> > +
> > &edp {
>
> Similar comments to patch set #1 about sort ordering.
ack
> ...I'll also notice that if we do end up setting the "critical" to 100
> C for most of veyron then I guess we'll have to switch it back to 90 C
> here for speedy to match downstream?
yes
> Maybe that's an argument for doing it in this patchset so we don't
> forget?
sounds good to me
> I'm somewhat amazed that downstream has only 10 C between "alert"
> and 'critical" for GPU for speedy, but I guess it's OK?
In tests on other veyron devices I observed gradual temperature
in response to CPU or GPU load, so unless there's a sudden spike in
the ambient temperature I think the 10°C delta should be fine with the
current polling interval of 100ms.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-15 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-15 15:31 [PATCH 1/2] dts: rockchip: raise GPU trip point temperature for veyron to 72.5 degC Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-05-15 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: raise GPU trip point temperature for speedy to 80 degC Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-05-15 18:30 ` Doug Anderson
2019-05-15 21:47 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2019-05-15 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] dts: rockchip: raise GPU trip point temperature for veyron to 72.5 degC Doug Anderson
2019-05-15 21:37 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190515214759.GF40515@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).