From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/18] kunit: test: add test resource management API
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 17:38:46 -0700
Message-ID: <20190517003847.0962F2082E@mail.kernel.org>
References: <20190514221711.248228-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20190514221711.248228-3-brendanhiggins@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190514221711.248228-3-brendanhiggins@google.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, keescook@google.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, Tim.Bird@sony.com, amir73il@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, jdike@addtoit.com, joel@jms.id.au, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, logang@deltatee.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, pmladek@suse.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, richard@nod.at, rientjes@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, wfg@linux.intel.com, Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-05-14 15:16:55)
> diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
> index 86f65ba2bcf92..a15e6f8c41582 100644
> --- a/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/kunit/test.c
[..]
> +
> +void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +       struct kunit_kmalloc_params params;
> +       struct kunit_resource *res;
> +
> +       params.size =3D size;
> +       params.gfp =3D gfp;
> +
> +       res =3D kunit_alloc_resource(test,
> +                                  kunit_kmalloc_init,
> +                                  kunit_kmalloc_free,
> +                                  &params);
> +
> +       if (res)
> +               return res->allocation;
> +       else
> +               return NULL;

Can be written as

	if (res)
		return ....
	return=20

and some static analysis tools prefer this.

> +}
> +
> +void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +       struct kunit_resource *resource, *resource_safe;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags);

Ah ok, test->lock is protecting everything now? Does it need to be a
spinlock, or can it be a mutex?

> +       list_for_each_entry_safe(resource,
> +                                resource_safe,
> +                                &test->resources,
> +                                node) {
> +               kunit_free_resource(test, resource);
> +       }
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags);
> +}
> +