From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 08:24:18 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add Support for Kontron SMARC-sAMX6i
Message-ID: <20190523002417.GA16359@dragon>
References: <20190509155834.22838-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
 <20190520021639.GG15856@dragon>
 <20190521082903.xsc643uvgqjg5ue7@pengutronix.de>
 <20190521091110.GG15856@dragon>
 <20190522105739.tp2mlxel2w7tdvv7@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190522105739.tp2mlxel2w7tdvv7@pengutronix.de>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Gilles.Buloz@kontron.com, Michael.Brunner@kontron.com, frieder.schrempf@kontron.de, thomas.schaefer@kontron.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, Stefan.Nickl@kontron.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de
List-ID: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:57:39PM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Okay, last question. Should I keep Priit Laes patch seperate and add one
> patch above or should I squash all of them?

It's fine to keep Priit's patch as separate.

Shawn