From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code. Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:13:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20190524081333.GA15566@kroah.com> References: <20190524000653.13005-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20190524000653.13005-4-atish.patra@wdc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190524000653.13005-4-atish.patra@wdc.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Atish Patra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo , Albert Ou , Andreas Schwab , Anup Patel , Catalin Marinas , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Jeremy Linton , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Morten Rasmussen , Otto Sabart , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Sudeep Holla , Thomas Gleixner , Will List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to > a common place instead of duplicate code. > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra > Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 23 --- > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 303 +----------------------------- > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/arch_topology.h | 28 +++ > include/linux/topology.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-) What, now _I_ have to maintain drivers/base/arch_topology.c? That's nice for everyone else, but not me :( Ugh. Anyway, what are you wanting to happen to this series? I think we need some ARM people to sign off on it before I can take the whole thing, right? thanks, greg k-h