From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] ti-sysc driver changes to drop custom hwmods property Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 23:16:14 -0700 Message-ID: <20190528061614.GL5447@atomide.com> References: <20190527121348.45251-1-tony@atomide.com> <380809b1-7152-faa5-9f43-2243fb4dad19@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <380809b1-7152-faa5-9f43-2243fb4dad19@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Keerthy Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Dave Gerlach , Faiz Abbas , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nishanth Menon , Peter Ujfalusi , Roger Quadros , Suman Anna , Tero Kristo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Keerthy [190528 00:58]: > > > On 27/05/19 5:43 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here are changes to improve ti-sysc driver to the point where we can > > finally drop the custom hwmods property for most cases. This series > > drops hwmods property only for omap4 UART and MMC as those can be > > tested with core retention idle. > > > > I'll be posting more patches for dropping hwmods properties as they > > get tested. > > Tony, > > What is the base of this series? It does not apply cleanly neither on > linux-next nor on top of 5.2->rc1. If there are dependencies do you have a > branch? Oh thanks for letting me know. It's against v5.2-rc1 but the first patch of the series got accidentally left out. Looks like I used -n option with git format-patch with -n 12 instead of -n13. I will repost the series. Regards, Tony