From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Gong <richard.gong@linux.intel.com>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dinguyen@kernel.org,
atull@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, sen.li@intel.com,
Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: A potential broken at platform driver?
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:28:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604142803.GA28355@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190604103241.GA4097@5WDYG62>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:33:03PM +0200, Romain Izard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 08:02:55PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > @@ -394,7 +432,7 @@ static struct platform_driver stratix10_rsu_driver = {
> > > .remove = stratix10_rsu_remove,
> > > .driver = {
> > > .name = "stratix10-rsu",
> > > - .groups = rsu_groups,
> > > +// .groups = rsu_groups,
> >
> > Are you sure this is the correct pointer? I think that might be
> > pointing to the driver's attributes, not the device's attributes.
> >
> > If platform drivers do not have a way to register groups properly, then
> > that really needs to be fixed, as trying to register it by yourself as
> > you are doing, is ripe for racing with userspace.
>
> This is a very common issue with platform drivers, and it seems to me that
> it is not possible to add device attributes when binding a device to a
> driver without entering the race condition.
>
> My understanding is the following one:
>
> The root cause is that the device has already been created and reported
> to the userspace with a KOBJ_ADD uevent before the device and the driver
> are bound together. On receiving this event, userspace will react, and
> it will try to read the device's attributes. In parallel the kernel will
> try to find a matching driver. If a driver is found, the kernel will
> call the probe function from the driver with the device as a parameter,
> and if successful a KOBJ_BIND uevent will be sent to userspace, but this
> is a recent addition.
>
> Unfortunately, not all created devices will be bound to a driver, and the
> existing udev code relies on KOBJ_ADD uevents rather than KOBJ_BIND uevents.
> If new per-device attributes have been added to the device during the
> binding stage userspace may or may not see them, depending on when userspace
> tries to read the device's attributes.
>
> I have this possible workaround, but I do not know if it is a good solution:
>
> When binding the device and the driver together, create a new device as a
> child to the current device, and fill its "groups" member to point to the
> per-device attributes' group. As the device will be created with all the
> attributes, it will not be affected by the race issues. The functions
> handling the attributes will need to be modified to use the parents of their
> "device" parameter, instead of the device itself. Additionnaly, the sysfs
> location of the attributes will be different, as the child device will show
> up in the sysfs path. But for a newly introduced device this will not be
> a problem.
>
> Is this a good compromise ?
Not really. You just want the attributes on the platform device itself.
Given the horrible hack that platform devices are today, what's one more
hack!
Here's a patch below of what should probably be done here. Richard, can
you change your code to use the new dev_groups pointer in the struct
platform_driver and this patch and let me know if that works or not?
Note, I've only compiled this code, not tested it...
thanks,
greg k-h
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 4d1729853d1a..3dd4b73a9b30 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_register_full(
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_register_full);
+static int platform_drv_remove(struct device *_dev);
static int platform_drv_probe(struct device *_dev)
{
struct platform_driver *drv = to_platform_driver(_dev->driver);
@@ -614,8 +615,18 @@ static int platform_drv_probe(struct device *_dev)
if (drv->probe) {
ret = drv->probe(dev);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
dev_pm_domain_detach(_dev, true);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+ if (drv->dev_groups) {
+ ret = device_add_groups(_dev, drv->dev_groups);
+ if (ret) {
+ platform_drv_remove(_dev);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ kobject_uevent(&_dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
}
out:
@@ -640,6 +651,8 @@ static int platform_drv_remove(struct device *_dev)
if (drv->remove)
ret = drv->remove(dev);
+ if (drv->dev_groups)
+ device_remove_groups(_dev, drv->dev_groups);
dev_pm_domain_detach(_dev, true);
return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h b/include/linux/platform_device.h
index cc464850b71e..027f1e1d7af8 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_device.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ struct platform_driver {
int (*resume)(struct platform_device *);
struct device_driver driver;
const struct platform_device_id *id_table;
+ const struct attribute_group **dev_groups;
bool prevent_deferred_probe;
};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-28 20:20 [PATCHv4 0/4] add Intel Stratix10 remote system update driver richard.gong
2019-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCHv4 1/4] firmware: stratix10-svc: extend svc to support RSU notify and WD features richard.gong
2019-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCHv4 2/4] firmware: add Intel Stratix10 remote system update driver richard.gong
2019-05-28 23:15 ` Greg KH
2019-05-29 14:15 ` Richard Gong
2019-05-28 23:22 ` Greg KH
2019-05-29 14:55 ` Richard Gong
2019-06-03 15:57 ` A potential broken at platform driver? Richard Gong
2019-06-03 18:02 ` Greg KH
2019-06-03 23:08 ` Richard Gong
2019-06-04 14:28 ` Greg KH
2019-06-04 10:33 ` Romain Izard
2019-06-04 14:28 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-06-04 16:13 ` Richard Gong
2019-06-04 17:03 ` Greg KH
2019-06-11 14:10 ` Richard Gong
2019-06-11 15:47 ` Greg KH
2019-05-28 23:24 ` [PATCHv4 2/4] firmware: add Intel Stratix10 remote system update driver Greg KH
2019-05-29 15:12 ` Richard Gong
2019-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCHv4 3/4] firmware: rsu: document sysfs interface richard.gong
2019-05-28 23:19 ` Greg KH
2019-05-29 15:33 ` Richard Gong
2019-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCHv4 4/4] MAINTAINERS: add maintainer for Intel Stratix10 FW drivers richard.gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190604142803.GA28355@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=atull@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=richard.gong@intel.com \
--cc=richard.gong@linux.intel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=romain.izard.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=sen.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).