From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] edac: add support for Amazon's Annapurna Labs EDAC Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 12:03:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20190606100312.GD26146@zn.tnic> References: <1559211329-13098-1-git-send-email-hhhawa@amazon.com> <1559211329-13098-3-git-send-email-hhhawa@amazon.com> <20190531051400.GA2275@cz.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Hawa, Hanna" Cc: "Herrenschmidt, Benjamin" , "james.morse@arm.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "Woodhouse, David" , "paulmck@linux.ibm.com" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "nicolas.ferre@microchip.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "Shenhar, Talel" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Chocron, Jonathan" , "Krupnik, Ronen" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 10:53:42AM +0300, Hawa, Hanna wrote: > Disagree. The various drivers don't depend on each other. > I think we should keep the drivers separated as they are distinct and > independent IP blocks. This topic comes up each time someone submits a new ARM EDAC driver: EDAC can't support different drivers because of the limitations it has. And a single platform driver works - see altera_edac. Again, James has a good write up with example how this can work so be patient. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.