From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and
 functions.
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:30:33 +0100
Message-ID: <20190624153033.3jpdd7vsekdiltmb@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20190617185920.29581-1-atish.patra@wdc.com>
 <20190617185920.29581-5-atish.patra@wdc.com>
 <20190619121057.GE1360@e107155-lin>
 <20190624150658.GA1623@e107155-lin>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190624150658.GA1623@e107155-lin>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 04:06:58PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:59:17AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > Currently, ARM32 and ARM64 uses different data structures to represent
> > > their cpu topologies. Since, we are moving the ARM64 topology to common
> > > code to be used by other architectures, we can reuse that for ARM32 as
> > > well.
> > >
> > > Take this opprtunity to remove the redundant functions from ARM32 and
> > > reuse the common code instead.
> > >
> > > To: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> > > Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> (on TC2)
> > > Reviewed-by : Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Hi Russell,
> > > Can we get a ACK for this patch ? We are hoping that the entire
> > > series can be merged at one go.
> >
> > It would be nice to get this in for v5.3 as it's almost there.
> > Are you fine with these changes ?
> >
> 
> Do you have any objections with this patch ? We plan to merge through
> RISC-V tree, please let us know. It has been acked-by all the other
> maintainers.

I have no interest in the CPU topology code; as far as I know I have
no systems that are able to exercise this code in any way.  Therefore,
I don't know this code, I have no way to test it, and so it is not
appropriate for me to ack patches for it.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up