From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Document RTD129x Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 20:10:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20190707201059.0e86dc71@why> References: <20190707132246.GB13340@arks.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190707132246.GB13340@arks.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Aleix Roca Nonell Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Matthias Brugger , Thomas Gleixner , Andreas =?UTF-8?B?RsOkcmJlcg==?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 15:22:46 +0200 Aleix Roca Nonell wrote: > Add binding for Realtek RTD129x interrupt controller. > > Signed-off-by: Aleix Roca Nonell > --- > .../realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt | 24 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..3ebb7c02afe5 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/realtek,rtd129x-intc.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ > +Realtek RTD129x IRQ Interrupt Controller > +======================================= > + > +Required properties: > + > +- compatible : Should be one of the following: > + - "realtek,rtd129x-intc-misc" > + - "realtek,rtd129x-intc-iso" What does 'iso' mean in this context? > +- reg : Specifies the address of the ISR, IER and Unmask > + register in couples of "address length". Are these registers actually interleaved with other stuff? What else it in between? > +- interrupts : Specifies the interrupt line which is mux'ed. > +- interrupt-controller : Presence indicates the node as interrupt controller. > +- #interrupt-cells : Shall be 1. See common bindings in interrupt.txt. So I guess this is level only, with an unspecified polarity? No edge interrupts? > + > + > +Example: > + > + interrupt-controller@98007000 { > + compatible = "realtek,rtd129x-iso-irq-mux"; It'd be good if the the example matched the rest of the documentation. > + reg = <0x98007000 0x4 0x98007040 0x4 0x98007004 0x4>; > + interrupts = ; > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <1>; > + }; Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.